ISSUE 013

Market Sizing, Honestly

Every so often somebody shows me a slide with a market size on it and a figure like forty billion dollars, and asks whether it is good. I never know what to say, because the number is not false exactly, it just does not constrain anything. You cannot sell to forty billion dollars. So this entry is about where those numbers come from, what it costs to buy one, and what an honest bottom-up estimate looks like for a business in one Missouri county — which it turns out you can build in an afternoon from two free files.

An idea worth thinking about

A $4,150 market figure that disagrees with itself on its own summary page

I picked a trade that matters to a lot of people reading this and went looking for a published market size. A firm called Meticulous Research publishes a report titled HVAC Services Market, dated July 2025, covering 2025 to 2035. The public page says the HVAC Services Market was valued at USD 66.8 billion in 2024, and projects it reaching USD 130.7 billion by 2035 from an estimated USD 70.5 billion in 2025, at a compound growth rate of 6.4 percent. The scope is global, across five regions.

The disclosure first, because it is the whole frame: this is a company whose business is selling that report. The licences are listed on the page — $1,950 for the data pack, $2,850 basic, $4,150 premium, $7,850 enterprise. Nothing improper about that. But the number is a product, and the page is its advertisement.

Here is what stopped me. The report summary table on that same page labels the 66.8 billion figure as the 2025 value, while the body text has 66.8 for 2024 and 70.5 for 2025. Two numbers for the same year, roughly four billion dollars apart, on one screen. The page also carries assurance labels like “Verified by the Meticulous Standard” and “ISO-Aligned Method” without saying what either involves, and lists a Research Methodology chapter in the contents without publishing it.

I am not telling you the figure is wrong. I have no way to know, and that is precisely the point. I cannot check it, because the method is behind a paywall and the definition of what counts as an HVAC service is not given. A number you cannot interrogate is not evidence, it is a decoration — and if the version on the free page cannot keep its own years straight, I would want to know a great deal more before I put it in front of a lender.

Look at the page

A tool I disappeared into

Your county, by the decade, free, from the Fed down the road

FRED is the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis's economic data site, and it carries county-level series for Missouri. No account, no paywall, download as CSV or Excel. As an example: series PCPI29031 is Per Capita Personal Income in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri. The 2024 figure is $55,279, up from $53,810 in 2023, $50,393 in 2022, $48,750 in 2021 and $46,318 in 2020.

Why that number and not a market size. Per capita personal income times the population of your trade area gives you the total amount of money the people you can physically reach have coming in. Everything you could ever sell them has to fit inside it, alongside their mortgage, their groceries and their truck payment. It is a ceiling, and it is a real one, computed from administrative data rather than from a panel.

Two limits worth knowing. FRED is a distribution layer, not the source — the county income estimates are produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and FRED republishes them, so the lag is theirs. This series was last updated on 5 February 2026 with 2024 data and the next release is scheduled for 2 December 2026, which means that at any given moment you are looking at a figure about eighteen months behind. And per capita means the arithmetic average across everyone including children, so it is not a household figure and not a typical person's income.

The thing I like about it is unglamorous. It is the same series, computed the same way, for your county and the one next door and the county your competitor just opened in. Nothing in a purchased report lets you make that comparison honestly, because the report does not know where you are.

Open the series

Learn something

The government asks the firms, and publishes what they said

Every five years the Census Bureau runs the Economic Census, which asks businesses what they did and how much they billed. The 2022 results are free, and for construction there are four tables, of which the interesting one is EC2223KOB: value of business done, broken out by kind of business, for the United States, the regions and the states. It downloads as a zip with a plain data file and a field dictionary inside, and the revenue column is in thousands of dollars.

I pulled the numbers for industry code 238220, plumbing, heating and air-conditioning contractors, so that the point of the last slot has something to lean on. In 2022 those contractors did $297.6 billion of business in the United States. Within that total, the line of work the Census calls heating, ventilation and air-conditioning contracting accounted for $121.7 billion. In Missouri the same industry did $5.40 billion, of which the HVAC line was $2.32 billion, inside a total Missouri construction sector of $56.9 billion.

Now hold that against the purchased figure in the second slot, carefully. That report put the global HVAC services market at $66.8 billion in 2024, and the Census says US contractors alone did $121.7 billion of HVAC work in 2022. That does not make the report wrong. It almost certainly means the two are counting different things — the Census figure is the value of business done, which includes installing equipment in new buildings, while a services market usually means maintenance and repair. The problem is that I had to guess that, because one of these two publishes its definitions and the other does not. When you cannot tell whether a gap is a disagreement or a definition, the number has stopped being useful.

The limits of the Census version are honest and published. It is 2022 data, so three to four years old depending on when you read this. The geographic detail in these tables stops at state level for construction, so there is no county breakdown here. And figures are suppressed wherever publishing them would disclose an individual firm. What you get in exchange is a number produced by asking the firms, with the questionnaire, the industry definitions and the suppression rules all printed next to it.

Open the tables

What we’re seeing

One billion, seven hundred eighty-five million dollars — the whole county

The Missouri Department of Revenue publishes, every quarter, how much taxable sales each county and city in the state recorded. For calendar year 2025, Cape Girardeau County came to $1,785,891,993.43, from quarterly figures of $416.3 million, $449.9 million, $449.8 million and $469.9 million. The fourth quarter shows 1,834 reporting accounts. Butler County, which is Poplar Bluff, came to $832.5 million. Howell County, which is West Plains, $691.8 million. Adair County, which is Kirksville, $448.8 million. The state total was $103,628,761,347.78.

What this is, precisely, before anybody misuses it. It is the sales tax base — the value of transactions subject to county sales tax, as reported on returns, for tax type Sales, with a run date of 17 April 2026. It is not the county economy. It excludes exempt and non-taxable transactions, most wholesale and business-to-business activity, and anything the sales tax does not reach. The file also notes that where six or fewer businesses exist in a category, the financial data is suppressed to protect confidential information. It is a real, legally reported number about a specific thing, which is more than most market figures manage, and it is still narrower than it looks.

Now do the arithmetic that a market-size slide never does. By my calculation, Cape Girardeau County is about 1.7 percent of Missouri's taxable sales. Divide the county's year by its 1,834 fourth-quarter accounts and you get roughly $974,000 of taxable sales per reporting account — a crude average across a hospital gift shop and a car dealership, so treat it as a sense of scale rather than a benchmark. Whatever you sell, your share comes out of that $1.79 billion, and it comes out against 7,490 other registered business locations in the same county.

Which is the honest bottom-up estimate, and it has three steps rather than three acronyms. One: how many potential buyers are inside the distance you will actually travel — households, firms, acres, trucks, whatever your unit is. Two: how much does one of them spend on your category in a year, taken from a real source, or from your own invoices if you have twenty of them. Three: what share could you plausibly serve with the staff and vehicles you have, which for most two-to-twenty person businesses is the binding constraint and never appears on the slide at all. Multiply. The answer will be embarrassingly small compared with anything in a purchased report, and it will be the first market number you have ever had that you could defend line by line.

The contrast across this entry is the argument. The purchased global figure cost $4,150, could not agree with itself about which year it described, and would not tell me how it was made. The Economic Census told me what it counted and when. The Department of Revenue told me what a specific county actually reported, to the cent, for free. The further down you go, the smaller the number gets and the more it constrains — and constraint is the only thing a market size is for.

So the practical version. Download your county from the Revenue file and write the year total at the top of a page. Underneath it, write your own revenue. The fraction is your market share in the only market you can reach, and it is almost certainly a far more interesting number than anything a report was going to sell you. If a lender or a grant reviewer asks for a market size, give them that, with the file name and the run date, and watch what happens.

Missouri Department of Revenue, Taxable Sales and Use Tax by Locality — County, calendar year 2025, zipped spreadsheet, run 17 April 2026

One question

What is your revenue as a share of your county's taxable sales?

Two numbers and a division. I suspect almost none of us have ever worked it out, which is why I am asking.

More in this pillar as it's written.

— Shana

Sources link to the original publisher, never to a summary.